Oscar Pérez de la Fuente. La Filosofía es necesaria

Oscar Pérez de la Fuente. La Filosofía es necesaria2 days ago

Nuevo post📑 "Franklin Roosevelt, adversidad y crecimiento", 🦉Estrategia Minerva Blog

#Optimismo #Todosomosminoria #lealtad #criticaconstruvtiva #Estadosocial

👇

https://webphilosophia.com/estrategia/franklin-roosevelt-adversidad-y-crecimiento/

Ver en Facebook

Oscar Pérez de la Fuente. La Filosofía es necesaria4 days ago

New review📖: Carbajal-Camberos, J. P. (2025), Przegląd Politologiczny 🇵🇱, (3), 313–315. https://doi.org/10.14746/pp.2025.30.3.21

Reviewed book 📗: Pérez de la Fuente, Oscar, Skrzypczak, Jędrzej (eds.), 📀Bridging the Digital Divide: Perspectives on Inequality and Discrimination in the Digital Age, Palgrave MacMillan, Cham, 2025, 187 pp. ISBN 303183478X

👇

https://webphilosophia.com/blog/review-juan-pablo-carabajal-bridging-the-digital-divide-przeglad-politologiczny/

Ver en Facebook

Oscar Pérez de la Fuente. La Filosofía es necesaria5 days ago

📢Sesión Seminario 🌎 Pluralismo cultural y minorías: “La protección de las minorías en el Consejo de Europa: Avances y desarrollos”, por Elwna Dáiz Galán, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos jueves 📆 15 de enero 2026 🕠 14:00h 🖥️ presencial en el aula Aula 18.0.A03 y online @idhbc_uc3m

Más información 👉 https://pluralismocultural.webphilosophia.com

Ver en Facebook

Oscar Pérez de la Fuente. La Filosofía es necesaria4 weeks ago

New post 📑"Diego de Saavedra Fajardo, Political enterprises", 🦉Minerva Strategy Blog

#goodmanners #educationfordemocracy #sectarism

👇

https://minervastrategy.webphilosophia.com/?p=372

Ver en Facebook

Oscar Pérez de la Fuente. La Filosofía es necesaria1 month ago

📣Call for papers 📑 Special Workshop “Democracy, free speech, disinformation and digital literacy”, 🏛️IVR World Congress of the Association of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Istanbul 🇹🇷, 📆28 June-3 July 2026

Democracy rests on a single, fragile premise: citizens can access reliable information, debate it freely, and then make reasoned choices. Free speech is therefore not a decorative luxury; it is the circulatory system of self-government. Without it, voters become disconnected from reality, and power flows to whoever controls the loudest megaphone.

Yet the digital age has broken the old filters that once separated signal from noise. In the pre-internet era, professional gatekeepers—editors, broadcasters, and fact-checkers—were imperfect, often biased, and sometimes captured by vested interests, but they operated under legal accountability, reputation costs, and shared norms. Today, any individual or state actor can reach millions instantly, anonymously, and at almost zero marginal cost. The result is an information environment in which deliberate disinformation spreads faster than truth because it is engineered to do so: emotionally charged, identity-affirming, and algorithmically boosted.

This is not an argument for censorship. State or corporate control of speech is the historic fast track to tyranny; the cure is almost always worse than the disease. The 20th century is littered with regimes that promised to “protect democracy” by silencing dissent and ended up destroying both. Once governments or unaccountable tech platforms are granted the power to decide what counts as “disinformation”, that power will inevitably be turned against political minorities, whistle-blowers, and legitimate controversy.

The only sustainable answer is mass digital literacy—taught early, reinforced often, and treated as a core civic duty comparable to jury service or voting itself. Citizens must learn to recognise motivated reasoning in themselves and others, to check primary sources, to distinguish between disagreeable opinion and verifiable falsehood, and to demand transparency from both platforms and officials. Schools that graduate functionally illiterate readers of charts, statistics, and metadata are failing democracy as surely as if they stopped teaching history.

Ultimately, democracy in the digital age will survive not because we found the perfect referee, but because enough citizens refuse to be passive consumers of weaponised narratives. Instead of this, they need to develop skills and habits to learn how to interpret the complexity of today’s world.

More information 👇

https://webphilosophia.com/blog/ivr-special-workshop-democracy-free-speech-disinformation-and-digital-literacy-istanbul-28-june-3-june-2026/

11Ver en Facebook

Buscar por:

Archivos

diciembre 2025
noviembre 2025
octubre 2025
abril 2025
marzo 2025
febrero 2025
enero 2025
diciembre 2024
octubre 2024
abril 2024
marzo 2024
febrero 2024
enero 2024
diciembre 2023
noviembre 2023
octubre 2023
abril 2023
marzo 2023
febrero 2023
enero 2023
noviembre 2022
octubre 2022
mayo 2022
abril 2022
marzo 2022
febrero 2022
enero 2022
noviembre 2021
octubre 2021
septiembre 2021
mayo 2021
abril 2021
marzo 2021
febrero 2021
diciembre 2020
noviembre 2020
octubre 2020
abril 2020
marzo 2020

Seminario permanente Pluralismo cultural y minorías

Actualidad y noticias. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

Navegando por
Mes: diciembre 2025

Sesión 5-2026: Elena Díaz Galán

19/12/2025 webphilosophia Comentarios 0 comentarios